Roman Jablonski Prof. Ph.D.Eng.
Piotr Kulinowski Ph.D.Eng.
University of Mining and Metallurgy, Cracow, Poland
Department of Mining Machines and Waste Utilization Equipment
Belt conveyors, tension systems, simulation tests
The principle of MFBT operation shows the scheme on Fig.3. The task of this tension system is to keep forces T1 and T2 in constant proportion (T1/T2 = constant = b/a) and to eliminate the belt slip on the drive pulley.
In belt conveyor drums are located on trolleys linked with rope. Its transmission ratio depends on the type of drive (friction factor between belt and the drum pulley surface, angle of wrap). The first trolley "A" is located in the area of belt running on the drive drum (red color on figures), the second one "B" in the area of belt running off the drive drum (green color on figures). (Fig.4, Fig.5)
The tension device described above will to exactly follow-up system
if both trolleys have possibility to move. If the trolley "A" will lean
against the buffer (extreme right position) then this device will be "fixed"
- T1/T2 is not constant.
For the verification of simulation tests authors used the TV-camera
to register a movement of the stretching trolley "A"
during starting of the empty conveyor (Fig.6). The result of measurement
is shown on fig.9 (green line).
The results of simulation tests are presented by using the computer
program DynaBelt.
Download
the compressed computer program dynabelt.zip (292 K).
2. Funke H., Könneker F.R.: Experimental Investigations and Theory for the Design of a Long-Distance Belt Conveyor System. Bulk Solids Handling, Vol.8, No. 5, p. 567-579. October 1988.
3. Jabłoński R. Zieba G.: Automatic Mechanical Follow-up Conveyor Belt Tension System. 5th International Conference on Bulk Materials Storage, Handling and Transportation. Newcastle 10-12 July 1995.
4. Jabłoński R., Kulinowski P.: The Comparison of Simulation Tests and Measurement Results of Selected Parameters of Automatic Follow-Up Device Stretching the Belt in The Belt Conveyor. Prace Naukowe Instytutu Górnictwa Pol. Wrocł. , p. 111-121. Szklarska Poręba 1996. (in Polish)
5. Karolewski B.: An Investigation of Various Conveyor Belt Drive Systems Using a Mathematical Model. Bulk Solids Handling, Vol.6, No. 2, p. 61-65. April 1986.
6. Kulinowski P., Jabłoński R.: Simulation Test of a Belt Conveyor Model. International Computer Science Conference microCAD'94.. Miskolc, Hungary 3.03.94. (in German)
7. Kulinowski P., Jabłoński R.: Computer - Aided Analysis of the Belt Conveyor Dynamics. Prace Naukowe Instytutu Górnictwa Pol. Wrocł. 78, p. 47-54. Szklarska Poręba 1995. (in Polish)
8. Nordell L.K., Ciozda Z.P.: Transient Belt Stresses During Starting and Stopping: Elastic Response Simulated by Finite Element Methods. Bulk Solids Handling, Vol.4, No. 1, p. 99-104. March 1984.
9. Otrebski M.: Influence of Motor Starting Sequence on Conveyor Start-Up. Bulk Solids Handling, Vol.15, No. 2, p. 253-256. April/June 1995.
10. Schulz G.: Analysis of Belt Dynamics in Horizontal Curves of Long Belt Conveyors. Bulk Solids Handling, Vol.15, No. 1, p. 25-30. January/March 1995.
11. Schulz G.: Calculation of the Dynamics of Long Belt Conveyors. Internet-http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Conveyor_Dynamics/ 1996.
12. Schulz G.: Comparison of Drives for Long Belt Conveyors. Bulk Solids Handling, Vol.15, No. 2, p. 247-251. April/June 1995.
13. Schulz G.: Further Results in the Analysis of Dynamic Characteristics of Belt Conveyors Bulk Solids Handling, Vol.13, No. 4, p. 705-710. November 1993.
14. Żur T.: Vicoelastic
Properties of Conveyor Belts. Bulk Solids Handling, Vol.6, No. 3, p.
85-92. June 1986.